Delivery Architecture Console

Design Your Delivery Topology

Build the team that ships without breaking under scale, AI acceleration, and roadmap pressure.

Visualize ownership, throughput, and AI-augmented delivery flow in one guided system.

Open Pricing EstimatorBook Strategy Call
GDPR alignedHIPAA capable (when applicable)Secure devices and MDMEncrypted infrastructureRole-based access controls

Page Navigation

Complexity SnapshotLATAM Timezone MatrixBottleneck DetectorTeam TopologyThroughput FlowAI Delivery LayerTopology PatternsRole GuidanceScale Path

1. System Complexity Snapshot

See what you are really operating

Inputs: tech stack, services, integrations, data pipelines, and AI components. Output: a clear complexity profile.

Single-service product

Core product with one main app and simple integrations.

Platform ecosystem

Multiple services with shared platform needs and ownership points.

Data-intensive system

Data pipelines and analytics workloads shape delivery pace.

AI-augmented pipeline

AI tools are embedded in delivery and need control boundaries.

2. LATAM Timezone and Talent Matrix

Match timezone, talent depth, and hiring speed

Reference timezone is US Eastern Time (UTC-5). Matrix view covers all 10 LATAM countries we represent with workday overlap, talent depth, hiring velocity, and delivery stability.

CountryUTCOverlap With US ETTalent DepthHiring VelocityStabilityLane
MexicoUTC-6

8h overlap

Primary
ColombiaUTC-5

9h overlap

Primary
BrazilUTC-3

7h overlap

Primary
ArgentinaUTC-3

7h overlap

Secondary
UruguayUTC-3

7h overlap

Secondary
Costa RicaUTC-6

8h overlap

Secondary
ChileUTC-3

7h overlap

Value
PeruUTC-5

9h overlap

Value
EcuadorUTC-5

9h overlap

Value
GuatemalaUTC-6

8h overlap

Value

Matrix intent: build one primary lane and one secondary lane to reduce hiring delay risk during demand spikes.

3. Delivery Bottleneck Detector

Find where flow will break first

Architecture ownership gaps

Critical choices wait too long because ownership is unclear.

DevOps bottlenecks

Deployments queue up when platform work is under-resourced.

Review and merge congestion

Code review load exceeds senior bandwidth.

AI workflow integration gaps

AI outputs are not tied to verification and reliability controls.

4. Recommended Team Topology

Use a clear role ownership layout

Topology Network View

Product IntakeFrontend PodBackend PodPlatformData / AIQA AutomationRelease

Core pod

  • Frontend Engineer
  • Backend Engineer
  • Senior Engineer (ownership)

Platform layer

  • DevOps / SRE
  • Platform Engineer

Data and AI layer

  • Data Engineer
  • ML Engineer

Quality and throughput

  • QA Automation (SDET)

5. Throughput Flow Visualization

Track flow from idea to improvement

Idea

Human decision zone

Build

AI-assisted + human coding

Review

Human quality gate

Deploy

AI-assisted automation

Monitor

AI signal + human response

Improve

Human prioritization

Delay Heat by Stage

Build38% delay pressure
Review52% delay pressure
Deploy34% delay pressure
Monitor24% delay pressure

Capacity Mix

Feature delivery42% allocation
Platform reliability28% allocation
Data and AI18% allocation
Quality and test12% allocation

Overlay logic: bottleneck points, AI-assisted zones, and human decision zones are shown at each stage.

6. AI-Augmented Delivery Layer

Make AI support clear and safe

AI assists

  • Code generation
  • Test scaffolding
  • Documentation drafts
  • Refactoring support

Humans own

  • Architecture decisions
  • System design quality
  • Final verification
  • Reliability and incident response

7. Topology Pattern Selector

Pick a pattern that fits your delivery reality

Stream-aligned pods

Best for continuous product delivery with clear team ownership.

Platform + product model

Best for scaling systems and reducing repeated engineering friction.

Parallel delivery lanes

Best for roadmap acceleration with resilience during demand spikes.

PatternThroughputReliabilityScale ReadinessGovernance Fit
Stream-aligned pods
Platform + product
Parallel delivery lanes

8. Role and Seniority Guidance

Map complexity to the right role level

  • L3 is enough for independent feature ownership and strong execution rhythm.
  • L4 is critical for architecture decisions, scale risk, and cross-team standards.
  • Platform roles become mandatory when deployment, observability, or infra queue up.
  • QA automation prevents repeat defects and supports stable release speed.
  • Legacy enterprise stacks still require dedicated specialists: Salesforce, Microsoft Dynamics 365, SAP, and Oracle.

9. Scale Evolution Path

Plan how your topology evolves over time

MVP

Small pod, fast learning loops, direct ownership.

Growth

Add platform support to keep release flow clean.

Scale

Split lanes by product streams and shared platform controls.

Platform maturity

Standardize quality gates, governance, and AI-assisted workflows.

Back to Pricing HomeOpen Executive Alignment Guide